Discover published sets by community

Challenge an incorrect interpretation of the law, potentially leading to reversal, remand, or modification of the order.

Claim errors in the procedural handling of the bankruptcy case; could lead to reversal, remand, or a new hearing.

Claim inconsistent treatment under the law, which may result in adjustment of claims or equitable relief.

Base the appeal on evidence not available during the original proceeding; could lead to a reversal or a new trial if the evidence is substantial.

Argue that the bankruptcy court did not have the authority to make the decision; the case may be dismissed or referred to the appropriate court.

Argue that the exemptions were misapplied, potentially leading to a reversal of the decision or remand for correction.

Contend that parties were not given proper notice, potentially leading to remedy by reopening the case or alteration of the order.

Argue that the bankruptcy judge made a decision that was arbitrary or unreasonable; may result in reversal or further review if abuse is proven.

Challenge the bankruptcy decision by showing that the court applied the wrong legal standard, potentially leading to reversal or remand for reconsideration.

Appeal on the grounds of poor legal representation; if proven, this can lead to a reversal or a new trial.

Challenge the ruling by arguing that the court went beyond its authorized powers; could result in a reversal or vacating the decision.

Appeal based on improper actions by creditors that violated the automatic stay, with potential remedies including damages or sanctions.

Contend that the bankruptcy proceedings violated the debtor's or creditor's due process rights, possibly resulting in a reversal or remand.

Contest the factual determinations made by the bankruptcy court; may result in reversal or remand if errors were material to the decision.