Discover published sets by community

The principle of reasonableness will likely provide that the geographic restriction should be reasonable and not overly broad, possibly leading to a conclusion that the clause may be narrowed by a court.

The principle of reasonableness is used, and a likely conclusion is that delivery times will be inferred based on industry standards, time of contracting, and specific circumstances surrounding the delivery.

The concept of jurisdiction is addressed, likely leading to the conclusion that New York courts have exclusive jurisdiction over disputes from this contract.

The parol evidence rule would apply, meaning the likely conclusion is that no prior agreements, negotiations, or representations aside from those within this written contract are legally binding.

This invokes the incorporation by reference principle, meaning the conclusion likely is that the 'Code of Conduct' is a term of the contract even though it is not physically present in the contract.

The principle of specificity will be used to interpret that only hand delivery or registered mail constitute valid methods of notice, potentially leading to the exclusion of other methods like email or fax.

The principle of termination at will would suggest that conclusion would be either party can indeed terminate the contract by providing the required notice without needing a specific reason.

Under the principle of express terms, the conclusion would be that the seller is explicitly undertaking a guarantee of performance for the goods sold.

The principle of trade term interpretation would lead to the likely conclusion that CIF (Cost, Insurance, Freight) is a recognized Incoterm which includes specific obligations for the seller relative to costs, insurance, and freight to New York.

The principle of automatic renewal is applied, likely leading to the conclusion that the lease will continue on a yearly basis after the initial term unless notice is provided.

Applying the principle of unconscionability, it can be concluded that such an all-encompassing limitation may not be enforceable if it's deemed excessively unfair to the other party.

This phrase specifically invokes the timeliness principle, leading to the conclusion that deadlines are strict and any delay could be considered a breach of contract.

This statement relies on the principle of good faith performance and thus the conclusion may be that the contractor is obligated to provide services at the highest standard they are capable of.

The caveat emptor principle would likely apply, meaning the conclusion would be that the tenant accepts the property in its current state and the landlord is not liable for any pre-existing conditions.

The principle of common usage and practices would be relevant here, leading to the conclusion that the contract should be interpreted in line with how such terms are commonly understood within the relevant industry.

The contra proferentem rule may apply, leading to the conclusion that any ambiguity will be interpreted against the interests of the party that drafted the term.

The ejusdem generis rule would apply, potentially leading to the conclusion that only events of a similar kind to those listed would be considered force majeure.

Using the principle of reasonableness, the interpretation might be that the indemnity is meant to cover only claims reasonably related to the contract’s objectives, not all conceivable claims.

Invoking the principle of reasonableness, it can be concluded that 'significant alterations' would be interpreted as substantive changes to the property that affect its value, function, or structure.

The principle of mutual assent will apply, and the likely conclusion is that both parties will need to clearly agree to termination without any prescribed legal formality.

The principle of implied terms may be invoked, with the likely conclusion that 'market price' would be interpreted based on the going rate for the goods or services at the time and place of delivery.

The principle of severability applies, leading to the conclusion that even if part of the contract is legally void, the rest of the contract remains valid and enforceable.

The discretionary authority principle applies, with the conclusion likely that the company has substantial leeway in deciding if and when bonuses are given, as long as it acts in good faith.

Ejusdem generis could be used to interpret 'etc.' as including other items of the same type, leading to the conclusion that similar items may be considered part of the contract.