Explore tens of thousands of sets crafted by our community.
Ethical Dilemmas in Journalism
20
Flashcards
0/20
A journalist has information that could prevent harm but would breach confidentiality agreements by publishing it.
Confidentiality, public harm, utilitarian ethics. Possible resolutions could be seeking a legal opinion, weighing the risks of harm against the duty to protect sources, or finding a way to indirectly raise awareness.
A journalist uncovers a story that might cause public panic if released. Should they publish it?
Responsibility to the public, preventing harm, journalistic sensationalism. Resolutions might be to publish the story with context to prevent panic, hold the story until more facts are gathered, or release it in parts.
A whistleblowing employee provides a journalist with company secrets that could impact national security. Publish?
National security, public interest, protection of sources. Key resolutions could be publishing the story with sensitive details redacted, consulting with authorities, or not publishing at all.
A successful sting operation by journalists uncovers wrongdoing but uses deception. Is the method justified?
Deception, public good, journalistic ethics. Possible resolutions might be justifying the deception by the magnitude of public interest, seeking an ethical review before publication, or refraining from such methods.
A political journalist is dating a politician. Can they impartially cover stories about that person’s policies?
Conflict of interest, impartiality, transparency. Journalists should consider recusal from reporting on the politician, disclosing the relationship if they do report, or transferring to another beat.
A journalist is offered a large sum of money to write a biased article. Accepting it would undermine impartiality. What should they do?
Bribery, impartial reporting, integrity. Resolutions include refusing the offer, disclosing the payment and biases openly to the public, or reporting on the bribe offer as a story on corruption.
A news outlet knows a celebrity's secret that's irrelevant to their public role. Is it right to reveal it for clicks?
Respect for privacy, public curiosity, clickbait journalism. Journalists might decide against publishing irrelevant personal details, publish with the individual's consent, or avoid sensationalizing.
A journalist discovers corruption in an organization that advertises heavily with their publication.
Conflict of interest, financial pressures, duty to report. Resolutions can include reporting anonymously, separating the business and editorial sides, or pushing for an external investigation.
A journalist interviewing vulnerable individuals must ensure they're not exploited. How to handle the interviews?
Vulnerability, consent, empathy. Possible resolutions include informed consent procedures, offering support services, or using anonymous interviews to protect individuals.
A journalist's investigation uncovers illegal activities in a minority community. Publishing might perpetuate stereotypes.
Stereotyping, fairness, societal harm. Possible resolutions are contextualizing the story to avoid generalizations, focusing on systemic issues, or highlighting positive aspects of the community.
A photojournalist captures a dignified public figure in an embarrassing, but newsworthy, situation.
Privacy, public interest, respect for dignity. Resolutions include not publishing the photo, publishing it with the figure's consent, or contextualizing the situation to mitigate humiliation.
A source offers private information about a public figure in exchange for positive coverage.
Bribery, objectivity, integrity. Journalists can resolve this by refusing the offer and reporting on the attempt to bribe, or by accepting information on condition of autonomy in reporting.
A source tips off a journalist about a politician's private life that could affect public perception. Report it?
Public interest, privacy, relevancy to public office. Possible resolutions are investigating if it impacts the politician's public duties, respecting personal privacy if it doesn't, or finding a middle ground.
A source offers exclusive information but only if the journalist agrees not to fact-check the data.
Journalistic standards, verification, trust. Possible resolutions include declining the offer, agreeing but verifying the information indirectly, or seeking additional sources.
A reporter learns of illegal activity by a close relative. Should they report it?
Conflict of interest, duty to the public, potential harm to personal relationships. Possible resolutions include recusing oneself from the story or reporting the information while seeking guidance from an editor.
During a crisis, a journalist finds personal details about victims that families might not know. Should they publish?
Sensitivity to victims, public interest, timing. Possible resolutions are waiting to publish until families are informed, partially publishing details, or withholding information that's not critical to the story.
A newspaper has a policy against naming rape victims, but a victim wants her name published to raise awareness.
Right to privacy, autonomy, respecting the subject's wishes. Resolutions may include discussion with the victim about implications, careful consideration of policy reasons, and possibly making an exception.
A journalist finds that other news outlets are reporting a rumor. Should they join in to stay competitive?
Verification, herd journalism, maintaining credibility. Possible resolutions include abstaining from reporting the rumor, fact-checking before publishing, or explaining to readers why they're not covering it.
An advertiser threatens to pull funding if a negative story about them is published. Should the journalist proceed?
Editorial independence, financial pressure, credibility. Resolutions may include proceeding with the story to maintain integrity, negotiating with the advertiser, or finding alternative funding sources.
A journalist receives leaked documents but cannot verify their authenticity. Is it responsible to publish them?
Verification, reliability, the potential for harm. Resolutions could be collaborating with others to verify authenticity, publishing with a disclaimer about their unverified status, or holding off on publication.
© Hypatia.Tech. 2024 All rights reserved.
