Discover published sets by community

The need to maintain legal norms and accountability during war, balancing military necessity with the protection of human rights.

The principle that civilians should not be targeted in war, raising discussions about the definition and status of combatants.

The question of who has the right to declare war, embedding issues of sovereignty, international law, and moral responsibility.

The use of computer technology to disrupt the activities of a state or organization, leading to discussions on sovereignty, espionage, and collateral impact.

The strategy of preventing nuclear war by promising a devastating retaliatory strike, raising ethical questions about mutual assured destruction.

Robotic systems capable of making decisions about the use of lethal force without human intervention, raising ethical dilemmas about control and accountability.

The morality of taking up arms to overthrow an oppressive regime, involving questions of legitimate authority and just cause.

The use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims, discussing the challenge of defining and ethically combating terrorism.

A view that prioritizes national interest and security without regard for moral considerations, using war as a tool of statecraft when necessary.

Consideration of the long-term damage to ecosystems caused by military action, raising questions of responsibility and sustainability.

Serious violations of the laws and customs of war, which include deliberately killing civilians, torture, taking hostages, and genocide.

Refusal to participate in military service due to moral or religious beliefs, raising issues of individual rights versus state needs.

A war launched in anticipation of immediate aggression by another party, raising questions about the justification of such an action.

Psychological damage suffered by soldiers as a result of their actions in conflict, bringing attention to care for veterans and the human cost of war.

The belief in the necessity of a strong military capability and its influence on policy and society, discussing the ethical implications.

The ethical principle that the violence used in war must be proportional to the attack suffered, aiming to minimize harm.

The strategic use of civilians to deter attacks on combatants or strategic locations, raising grave ethical concerns about coercion and respect for life.

The deployment of international military and civilian personnel with the goal of promoting peace and security, evaluating effectiveness and moral dilemmas.

The belief that war and violence are unjustifiable, and that all disputes should be settled by peaceful means.

Unintended harm to civilians or destruction of civilian property during war, raising questions of proportionality and non-combatant immunity.

The use of unmanned aerial systems in combat, bringing up ethical concerns about risk, accountability, and distinction between combatants and civilians.

A global political commitment to prevent genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity through appropriate means.

The employment of biased information to influence public perception or morale, raising ethical concerns over the manipulation of truth.

A framework for judging the morality of a conflict, focusing on the just cause, right intention, proper authority, last resort, probability of success, and proportionality.

The ethical implications of using economic sanctions to coerce a state, often affecting the civilian population and their well-being.

A legal and ethical principle that justifies the use of force in war but requires it to be directed towards achieving a legitimate military objective.

Corporate entities that provide military services, raising issues about profit motives in war and accountability.

Weapons that use toxic chemicals or infectious agents, widely condemned for their indiscriminate nature and long-term effects on populations.