Logo
Pattern

Discover published sets by community

Explore tens of thousands of sets crafted by our community.

Microkernel vs Monolithic Kernel

15

Flashcards

0/15

Still learning
StarStarStarStar

Modularity

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels are highly modular, allowing for easier updates and maintenance; monolithic kernels have less modularity and can be more challenging to modify.

StarStarStarStar

Typical Use Cases

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels are more common in environments requiring high reliability and security, like aerospace; monolithic kernels are widespread in general-purpose computing, like Linux.

StarStarStarStar

Structure

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels have a minimalistic approach, separating essential services; monolithic kernels have all system services in one large block.

StarStarStarStar

Performance implications

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels can have performance overhead due to inter-process communication (IPC); monolithic kernels typically offer higher performance due to direct service invocations.

StarStarStarStar

Complexity of Code

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels have less complex code in the kernel space; monolithic kernels have complex and large code bases for providing various services.

StarStarStarStar

Boot Time

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels can have longer boot times due to the initialization of separate services; monolithic kernels generally boot faster.

StarStarStarStar

User-space Services

StarStarStarStar

Microkernel architectures run most services in user space; monolithic kernels run most services in kernel space, with direct access to hardware.

StarStarStarStar

Maintenance

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels are easier to maintain due to their simplicity and modularity; monolithic kernels can be harder to maintain due to interdependencies between components.

StarStarStarStar

Service Isolation

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels run services in user space leading to greater isolation; monolithic kernels run services in kernel space with less isolation.

StarStarStarStar

Reliability

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels can be more reliable due to service isolation; monolithic kernels can be less fault-tolerant since a bug can compromise the entire system.

StarStarStarStar

Security

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels have a smaller attack surface and potentially better fault isolation; monolithic kernels have a larger attack surface due to the extensive code base.

StarStarStarStar

Ease of development

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels offer simpler development for individual components; monolithic kernels require developers to understand the whole system for creating changes.

StarStarStarStar

Extensibility

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels are more extensible due to their modular structure; monolithic kernels are less adaptable to new features.

StarStarStarStar

Scalability

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels can scale better due to their modularity; monolithic kernels can suffer from code complexity when scaling.

StarStarStarStar

System Call Overhead

StarStarStarStar

Microkernels have higher system call overhead due to messaging passing; monolithic kernels have lower system call overhead.

Know
0
Still learning
Click to flip
Know
0
Logo

© Hypatia.Tech. 2024 All rights reserved.