Logo
Pattern

Discover published sets by community

Explore tens of thousands of sets crafted by our community.

Famous Immigration Cases

15

Flashcards

0/15

Still learning
StarStarStarStar

Arizona v. United States

StarStarStarStar

In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down parts of an Arizona law requiring police to check the immigration status of people they stop. The Court upheld the federal government's primacy in immigration enforcement.

StarStarStarStar

Plyler v. Doe

StarStarStarStar

The Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that states cannot deny education to undocumented children. The Court found that such a policy violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

StarStarStarStar

Chy Lung v. Freeman

StarStarStarStar

In 1875, the Supreme Court invalidated California's discriminatory law that imposed burdensome requirements on Chinese women to enter the United States, reinforcing federal control over immigration.

StarStarStarStar

United States v. Wong Kim Ark

StarStarStarStar

In 1898, the Supreme Court held that a child born in the U.S. to Chinese parents became a citizen at birth under the Fourteenth Amendment, establishing jus soli (right of the soil) as a principle of citizenship.

StarStarStarStar

Kerry v. Din

StarStarStarStar

In 2015, the Supreme Court ruled that a U.S. citizen's due process rights were not violated when her Afghan husband was denied a visa under a broad counterterrorism law without detailed explanations.

StarStarStarStar

Sessions v. Morales-Santana

StarStarStarStar

The Supreme Court in 2017 struck down a gender distinction in immigration law that determined how citizenship passed to children born abroad, finding it violated the equal protection principle.

StarStarStarStar

Padilla v. Kentucky

StarStarStarStar

In 2010, the Supreme Court decided that criminal defense attorneys must advise non-citizen clients about the deportation risks of guilty pleas, establishing the duty under the Sixth Amendment's effective counsel guarantee.

StarStarStarStar

Zadvydas v. Davis

StarStarStarStar

In 2001, the Supreme Court interpreted the Immigration and Nationality Act to forbid indefinite detention of immigrants under a deportation order if their deportation is not reasonably foreseeable.

StarStarStarStar

Jama v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

StarStarStarStar

In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled that the government can deport immigrants to their country of birth, even if that country's government does not consent to receiving them.

StarStarStarStar

Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton et Fils S.A.

StarStarStarStar

In 1987, the Supreme Court decision related to the power of federal courts to appoint private attorneys to prosecute criminal contempt charges, though not an immigration case, has significant implications for legal proceedings including immigration.

StarStarStarStar

Trump v. Hawaii

StarStarStarStar

In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the Trump administration's travel ban on several predominantly Muslim countries, stating the president has broad discretion to suspend the entry of foreigners.

StarStarStarStar

Reno v. Flores

StarStarStarStar

In 1993, the Supreme Court addressed the detention of unaccompanied immigrant children, allowing the government to detain minors in a manner consistent with their wellbeing and without an individualized custody determination.

StarStarStarStar

Lopez v. Davis

StarStarStarStar

In 2001, this Supreme Court case centered on the interpretation of federal laws concerning early release of prisoners, which, by extension, affects the treatment of immigrants in detention.

StarStarStarStar

Jennings v. Rodriguez

StarStarStarStar

In 2018, the Supreme Court held that detained non-citizens do not have a statutory right to periodic bail hearings during immigration proceedings, reinforcing prolonged detentions for immigration enforcement purposes.

StarStarStarStar

DHS v. Regents of the University of California

StarStarStarStar

In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that the Department of Homeland Security's decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program was arbitrary and capricious, and violated administrative law.

Know
0
Still learning
Click to flip
Know
0
Logo

© Hypatia.Tech. 2024 All rights reserved.