Explore tens of thousands of sets crafted by our community.
Logical Positivism and Its Critics
20
Flashcards
0/20
Philosophy's role is to clarify language and logic, not to produce substantive truths.
This stance is criticized for diminishing the role and value of philosophy in addressing complex truths.
Logical positivism asserts the unity of science through common language and methodology.
Critics point out that different sciences use divergent methods and languages, revealing disunity.
Logical positivists sought to reduce mathematics and logic to empirical science.
Critics argue that mathematical and logical truths cannot be empirically verified and have an a priori nature.
Logical positivism has a strict empiricist orientation which denies theoretical speculation.
This denies the heuristic value and role of speculation in the development of scientific theories.
Ethical and aesthetic statements are non-cognitive and merely express emotions or prescriptions.
This view is criticized for neglecting the rational aspects of ethics and aesthetics.
The logical positivism movement often is seen as ignoring the historical and social context of scientific theories.
The assumption that scientific theories can be understood in isolation from their historical context is criticized.
The distinction between science and non-science is demarcated by verifiability.
The demarcation problem is criticized because many scientific hypotheses cannot be definitively verified or falsified.
Logical positivism rejects synthetic a priori knowledge as meaningful.
Critics argue that there are legitimate instances of synthetic a priori knowledge, such as mathematical propositions and principles of causality.
The principle of verification leads to a narrow conception of experience.
Critics claim a broader conception of experience is necessary to include moral, aesthetic, and spiritual dimensions.
Only statements verifiable through empirical observation or logical proof are meaningful.
Unverifiable metaphysical, ethical, and theological statements are dismissed as nonsensical.
The criterion of meaningfulness is often too strict, excluding many scientific theories.
The criterion excludes theoretical entities that are not directly observable but are scientifically useful.
Logical positivism promotes a scientistic view, claiming science is the ultimate arbiter of truth.
This view is criticized for being dismissive of other forms of knowledge and understanding not derived from science.
Analytic statements are tautological and only explicate definitions without stating facts about the world.
This undermines the significance of analytic statements in contributing to actual knowledge.
Historical and sociological propositions are disregarded by logical positivism if they are not verifiable.
Criticism arises due to the abundance of meaningful historical and sociological propositions that cannot be empirically verified.
Logical positivism insists on the meaninglessness of unobservable entities.
The critique arises especially in the context of quantum mechanics, where unobservable entities are a key part of the theory.
Logical positivism maintains that metaphysical arguments cannot be resolved.
Critics argue that by dismissing metaphysical arguments as meaningless, logical positivism fails to engage with important philosophical issues.
Metaphysics is rejected as it does not rely on empirical evidence or logical analysis.
The dismissal of metaphysics is criticized for being overly restrictive and eliminating meaningful discourse.
The verification principle itself is not empirically verifiable.
The principle is considered a statement of metaphilosophy and can't be verified by its own standards.
Logical positivism is reductionist in its approach to complex concepts and phenomena.
This approach is criticized for potentially oversimplifying and failing to capture the richness of complex concepts.
The meaning of a statement is its method of verification.
This verificationism is criticized as overly restrictive and dismisses other types of meaning.
© Hypatia.Tech. 2024 All rights reserved.
