Discover published sets by community

Cost: $1.6 billion, Financing Model: Joint venture between New York Jets and New York Giants, Economic Impact: Mixed results, often argued that public benefits did not match the cost.$

Cost: Approx. $1.5 billion, Financing Model: Public-private partnership, Economic Impact: Increased tourism, but debates over opportunity cost for the taxpayers.$

Cost: $2.3 billion, Financing Model: Predominantly public subsidies with private financing, Economic Impact: Controversial use of public funds with debatable regeneration benefits.$

Cost: $1.9 billion, Financing Model: Public-private partnership, Economic Impact: Expected boost in tourism and job creation, but large public contribution questioned.$

Cost: $1.15 billion, Financing Model: Public funding through sales tax increase plus private investment, Economic Impact: Boost in local spending, but long-term benefits are debated.$

Cost: £798 million, Financing Model: Private financing with public sector support, Economic Impact: Revitalized area, but public costs were significant and long-term payback is debated.

Cost: More than $5 billion, Financing Model: Privately financed by Rams owner, with public support in infrastructure, Economic Impact: Expected to be a major catalyst for local economy, but full impact yet to be seen.$

Cost: $1.061 billion, Financing Model: Public-private partnership, Economic Impact: Economic benefits to the area via increased tourism and hosting events, despite high public cost.$

Cost: Approx. £1 billion, Financing Model: Private financing with some public support, Economic Impact: Positive impact on local regeneration, job creation, and tourism.

Cost: $1.1 billion for the latest renovation, Financing Model: Entirely privately funded, Economic Impact: Significant due to consistent use for sports and entertainment, though not a typical stadium.$

Cost: ¥156.9 billion, Financing Model: Publicly financed, Economic Impact: Built for the Olympics and expected to boost tourism, though high initial cost.

Cost: €290 million, Financing Model: Public-private partnership, Economic Impact: Host to numerous major events, albeit public investment has been questioned in terms of long-term value.

Cost: $325 million, Financing Model: Primarily private financing, Economic Impact: Positive effect on region's economy through events and games, but limited use outside football and soccer.$

Cost: MXN $260 million in 1966, Financing Model: Privately financed, Economic Impact: Iconic for Mexican football and significant cultural impact, though economic specifics are debated.$

Cost: €1.73 billion for renovation (Espai Barça project), Financing Model: Debt financing and commercial partnerships, Economic Impact: Expected to boost tourism and local economy, but concerns over long-term debt sustainability.

Cost: $357 million, Financing Model: Private financing, Economic Impact: Positive contribution to the local economy through revitalization of the area and consistent use.$

Cost: €340 million, Financing Model: Private financing by football clubs, Economic Impact: Boost to local economy and international attraction, especially on match days.

Cost: ¥4.3 billion, Financing Model: State-owned enterprise investment, Economic Impact: Symbol of the Beijing Olympics and a tourist attraction, though the high maintenance cost raises concerns.

Cost: R$1.3 billion for the 2014 renovation, Financing Model: Public-private partnership, Economic Impact: Rich football history contributes to tourism, but the post-event use is often criticized.$

Cost: £486 million, Financing Model: Publicly financed, Economic Impact: Key part of the London 2012 legacy, but the conversion for football use has been controversial.

Cost: Approx. $1.4 billion, Financing Model: Entirely privately funded by the Golden State Warriors, Economic Impact: Expected to catalyze redevelopment in the Mission Bay neighborhood of San Francisco.$

Cost: $606 million for the 2003 renovation, Financing Model: Public financing through hotel taxes, Economic Impact: Increased tourism and economic activity on game days, though large public investment questioned.$

Cost: €183 million, Financing Model: Public-private partnership, Economic Impact: Hoped to elevate Bordeaux as a host city for major events, though full impact is under review.

Cost: No recent renovation costs available, Financing Model: Owned and operated by Boca Juniors, Economic Impact: Celebrated cultural icon, crucial to identity of the local community, with consistent matchday revenue.