Explore tens of thousands of sets crafted by our community.
Legal Precedents in Criminal Law
20
Flashcards
0/20
Plessy v. Ferguson
1896, established the doctrine of 'separate but equal', which was later overturned by Brown v. Board of Education in the context of segregation.
Brady v. Maryland
1963, determined that the prosecution must turn over all evidence that might exonerate the defendant to the defense.
Ring v. Arizona
2002, held that a jury, rather than a judge, must find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty.
Furman v. Georgia
1972, temporarily halted capital punishment in the U.S., as it was found to be applied in a discriminatory manner and thus constituted cruel and unusual punishment.
Crawford v. Washington
2004, determined that defendants have the right to confront their accusers and that out-of-court statements that are testimonial are not admissible unless the witness is unavailable, and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine.
Apprendi v. New Jersey
2000, ruled that any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Gideon v. Wainwright
1963, ruled that the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel means that criminal defendants are entitled to legal representation, even if they cannot afford it.
Strickland v. Washington
1984, established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated by inadequate legal representation.
Tennessee v. Garner
1985, ruled that the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of an unarmed, non-dangerous fleeing suspect is an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment.
Illinois v. Gates
1983, established a flexible 'totality of the circumstances' test for determining the probable cause needed for a search warrant.
Miranda v. Arizona
1966, established Miranda rights, requiring law enforcement to advise suspects of their rights to silence and counsel upon arrest.
Mapp v. Ohio
1961, established the exclusionary rule, preventing illegally obtained evidence from being used in court.
Roper v. Simmons
2005, held that executing individuals who were under 18 at the time of their capital crimes is unconstitutional.
Terry v. Ohio
1968, established that stop-and-frisk searches could be constitutional without probable cause for arrest, if there is reasonable suspicion of a crime.
Gregg v. Georgia
1976, reinstated the death penalty under a new set of guidelines intended to remove arbitrariness and discrimination in its application.
United States v. Salerno
1987, affirmed the government's right to detain arrestees before trial if they are deemed dangerous to the community.
Batson v. Kentucky
1986, prohibited the use of peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race, establishing the Batson challenge.
North Carolina v. Alford
1970, recognized the validity of a guilty plea by a defendant who simultaneously maintains their innocence, under the condition that a sufficient factual basis for the plea exists.
Arizona v. Gant
2009, held that police may only search a vehicle incident to arrest if the arrestee is unsecured and within reach of the passenger compartment at the time or it's reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest.
Katz v. United States
1967, expanded the Fourth Amendment protection against illegal searches to include electronic surveillance and established the 'reasonable expectation of privacy' standard.
© Hypatia.Tech. 2024 All rights reserved.