Logo
Pattern

Discover published sets by community

Explore tens of thousands of sets crafted by our community.

Legal Precedents in Criminal Law

20

Flashcards

0/20

Still learning
StarStarStarStar

Plessy v. Ferguson

StarStarStarStar

1896, established the doctrine of 'separate but equal', which was later overturned by Brown v. Board of Education in the context of segregation.

StarStarStarStar

Brady v. Maryland

StarStarStarStar

1963, determined that the prosecution must turn over all evidence that might exonerate the defendant to the defense.

StarStarStarStar

Ring v. Arizona

StarStarStarStar

2002, held that a jury, rather than a judge, must find the aggravating factors necessary for imposing the death penalty.

StarStarStarStar

Furman v. Georgia

StarStarStarStar

1972, temporarily halted capital punishment in the U.S., as it was found to be applied in a discriminatory manner and thus constituted cruel and unusual punishment.

StarStarStarStar

Crawford v. Washington

StarStarStarStar

2004, determined that defendants have the right to confront their accusers and that out-of-court statements that are testimonial are not admissible unless the witness is unavailable, and the defendant had a prior opportunity to cross-examine.

StarStarStarStar

Apprendi v. New Jersey

StarStarStarStar

2000, ruled that any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

StarStarStarStar

Gideon v. Wainwright

StarStarStarStar

1963, ruled that the Sixth Amendment's right to counsel means that criminal defendants are entitled to legal representation, even if they cannot afford it.

StarStarStarStar

Strickland v. Washington

StarStarStarStar

1984, established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated by inadequate legal representation.

StarStarStarStar

Tennessee v. Garner

StarStarStarStar

1985, ruled that the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of an unarmed, non-dangerous fleeing suspect is an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

StarStarStarStar

Illinois v. Gates

StarStarStarStar

1983, established a flexible 'totality of the circumstances' test for determining the probable cause needed for a search warrant.

StarStarStarStar

Miranda v. Arizona

StarStarStarStar

1966, established Miranda rights, requiring law enforcement to advise suspects of their rights to silence and counsel upon arrest.

StarStarStarStar

Mapp v. Ohio

StarStarStarStar

1961, established the exclusionary rule, preventing illegally obtained evidence from being used in court.

StarStarStarStar

Roper v. Simmons

StarStarStarStar

2005, held that executing individuals who were under 18 at the time of their capital crimes is unconstitutional.

StarStarStarStar

Terry v. Ohio

StarStarStarStar

1968, established that stop-and-frisk searches could be constitutional without probable cause for arrest, if there is reasonable suspicion of a crime.

StarStarStarStar

Gregg v. Georgia

StarStarStarStar

1976, reinstated the death penalty under a new set of guidelines intended to remove arbitrariness and discrimination in its application.

StarStarStarStar

United States v. Salerno

StarStarStarStar

1987, affirmed the government's right to detain arrestees before trial if they are deemed dangerous to the community.

StarStarStarStar

Batson v. Kentucky

StarStarStarStar

1986, prohibited the use of peremptory challenges to exclude jurors on the basis of race, establishing the Batson challenge.

StarStarStarStar

North Carolina v. Alford

StarStarStarStar

1970, recognized the validity of a guilty plea by a defendant who simultaneously maintains their innocence, under the condition that a sufficient factual basis for the plea exists.

StarStarStarStar

Arizona v. Gant

StarStarStarStar

2009, held that police may only search a vehicle incident to arrest if the arrestee is unsecured and within reach of the passenger compartment at the time or it's reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest.

StarStarStarStar

Katz v. United States

StarStarStarStar

1967, expanded the Fourth Amendment protection against illegal searches to include electronic surveillance and established the 'reasonable expectation of privacy' standard.

Know
0
Still learning
Click to flip
Know
0
Logo

© Hypatia.Tech. 2024 All rights reserved.