Discover published sets by community

This standard is used to determine how an average person would responsibly act under similar circumstances. It serves as a comparative benchmark in negligence cases.

In Canadian law, the Oakes Test assesses whether a law that violates a protected Charter right can be justified under Section 1. It evaluates the law's pressing and substantial purpose, proportionality, and least restrictive means.

Probable cause is the legal standard that allows for arrest, searches, and seizure of property when law enforcement has sufficient facts and circumstances to believe a person has committed or is about to commit a crime.

Intermediate scrutiny is a test applied by courts when considering the constitutionality of laws that involve certain protected classes. The law must serve an important government objective and be substantially related to the objective.

This test was used to determine whether speech could be restricted based on its potential to present a clear and present danger to society, such as inciting violence.

This test supplements the M'Naghten Rule by considering whether a defendant was unable to control their actions, even if they understood that what they were doing was wrong.

This standard provides a rule of evidence regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony based on methodology, relevance, and reliability.

Mens rea refers to the guilty mind or intent to commit a crime. It's a key element in establishing criminal liability and involves assessing the defendant's mental state at the time of the offense.

This test addresses obscenity in speech or expression. It evaluates whether material appeals to prurient interests, depicts sexual conduct in an offensive way, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

The strictest form of judicial review, strict scrutiny requires a law to serve a compelling government interest, be narrowly tailored to achieve that interest, and be the least restrictive means for achieving it.

This standard evaluates the admissibility of scientific evidence based on whether the methodology or principle has gained general acceptance in its field.

Actus reus is the physical act of committing a crime. It must be a voluntary act or omission that results in harm, and it's a requisite element for establishing criminal liability.

The Briginshaw standard raises the bar for the degree of persuasion required to meet the balance of probabilities in civil matters, particularly when the subject matter is serious.

This rule applies to the defense of insanity and states that a defendant could be found not guilty by reason of insanity if, at the time of the crime, they were unable to understand the nature of the act or did not know it was wrong.

Also known as the 'product test,' it asserts that a defendant is not criminally responsible if their unlawful act was the product of a mental disease or defect.

BARD, or 'Beyond A Reasonable Doubt', is the standard of proof required to convict a defendant in a criminal case. It signifies that there must be no reasonable doubt as to the defendant's guilt.

This test determines when inflammatory speech intending to incite illegal action can be restricted. The speech must be directed to inciting imminent lawless action and is likely to produce such action.

Used in constitutional law to assess whether a law violates the Establishment Clause by establishing ties between government and religion. It considers the law's purpose, effect, and entanglement with religion.

This test assesses whether a law or government action is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. It's the most deferential standard of review applied in constitutional law cases.