Logo
Pattern

Discover published sets by community

Explore tens of thousands of sets crafted by our community.

Historical Juvenile Law Cases

10

Flashcards

0/10

Still learning
StarStarStarStar

Roper v. Simmons

StarStarStarStar

Roper v. Simmons (2005) held that it is unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under the age of 18, recognizing the lesser culpability of juveniles in comparison to adults.

StarStarStarStar

New Jersey v. T.L.O.

StarStarStarStar

New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985) decided that school officials do not need a warrant to search a student's property, as long as the search is 'reasonable' in its inception and scope, thereby setting a different standard for searches in schools.

StarStarStarStar

In re Winship

StarStarStarStar

In re Winship (1970) established the standard of 'proof beyond a reasonable doubt' in juvenile court proceedings, which was the same standard as for adult criminal trials, thus increasing the burden of proof required in juvenile court.

StarStarStarStar

Miller v. Alabama

StarStarStarStar

Miller v. Alabama (2012) held that mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole for juveniles violate the Eighth Amendment, necessitating individualized sentencing for juvenile offenders.

StarStarStarStar

Graham v. Florida

StarStarStarStar

Graham v. Florida (2010) ruled that juveniles cannot be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole for non-homicide offenses, arguing that such sentences violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.

StarStarStarStar

Schall v. Martin

StarStarStarStar

Schall v. Martin (1984) upheld the preventive detention of juveniles if they are considered a risk to public safety, thereby affirming the government's interest in protecting the community from serious juvenile offenders.

StarStarStarStar

J.D.B. v. North Carolina

StarStarStarStar

J.D.B. v. North Carolina (2011) determined that the age of a child is relevant when considering Miranda custody analysis, thereby providing additional protection for juveniles during police questioning.

StarStarStarStar

Kent v. United States

StarStarStarStar

Kent v. United States (1966) guaranteed the right to a hearing before a juvenile can be transferred to adult court, and the decision must include a statement of reasons, thereby providing juveniles with additional procedural protections.

StarStarStarStar

Breed v. Jones

StarStarStarStar

Breed v. Jones (1975) protected juveniles from double jeopardy. It stated that once a juvenile court has adjudicated a child as a delinquent, they cannot be tried for the same charge as an adult.

StarStarStarStar

In re Gault

StarStarStarStar

In re Gault (1967) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that afforded juveniles the same due process rights as adults, including the right to legal counsel, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to remain silent.

Know
0
Still learning
Click to flip
Know
0
Logo

© Hypatia.Tech. 2024 All rights reserved.