Discover published sets by community

Increase affordability by subsidizing the cost of market-rate rentals, yet high demand can outpace supply.

Protects cultural heritage but can restrict modifications and increase maintenance costs, impacting affordability.

Provides temporary relief in crises but is not a long-term solution for systemic housing affordability issues.

Helps lower-income buyers afford homeownership, but programs may not scale to meet all needs.

Transforms existing structures into housing, which can be cost-effective, but may face zoning or community pushback.

Encourages the efficient use of land, which could lower costs for housing development, but may be passed on to renters initially.

Ensure safety standards but can increase costs, potentially making housing less affordable.

Can prevent urban sprawl and protect open space, but might also limit housing supply and raise prices inside the boundary.

Addresses homelessness by providing housing without preconditions, improving stability but may require significant investment.

Offers more affordable, smaller-scale living options but may not be suitable for all demographics.

Provides affordable options for low-income residents, but can be stigmatized and underfunded.

Encourages construction of affordable units, but effectiveness depends on the structure and targeting of the incentives.

Dedicated funds for affordable housing can stabilize or increase supply, but effectiveness depends on consistent funding allocation.

Rent control can keep housing more affordable for incumbent renters, but may reduce investment in housing and limit availability.

Aims to make homeownership more attainable, but can disproportionately benefit higher-income households.

Requires developers to provide a percentage of units at below-market rates, increasing access but potentially raising costs for market-rate units.

Increases the supply of affordable housing but requires consistent funding and may face not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) opposition.

Allows developers to build more units than normally permitted, increasing housing stock but can result in greater infrastructure stress.

Aims to shield renters from unfair practices and evictions, thereby enhancing stability but can deter rental investment.