Discover published sets by community

An objection used when the person presented as an expert does not possess the necessary qualifications or expertise.

This objection is raised when two or more questions are combined into one, possibly confusing the witness and obscuring the answer.

This objection is raised when a witness extends their testimony beyond what the evidence can support.

An objection raised when the attorney's question presupposes unproven facts.

This objection is made when the question is designed to provoke the witness rather than elicit information.

This objection is used when one party asks a witness a question that suggests its own answer.

This objection is raised when the information presented isn't directly related to the case.

An objection to testimony that contains multiple layers of hearsay, where statements rely on the report of another person who also wasn't under oath.

This objection is used when a question posed is not clear enough for the witness to properly respond.

An objection raised when the opposing attorney misstates or exaggerates testimony or evidence.

This objection is used when an attorney repeats a question that has already been answered.

This objection is made when a witness testifies to matters they have no direct experience or knowledge of.

This objection is used when a layperson (non-expert) witness expresses an opinion outside the realm of general knowledge or their own perception.

This objection is when a witness does not directly answer the question asked.

An objection related to evidence or testimony that attempts to prove or challenge a witness's honesty without a proper basis.

An objection based on inappropriate actions taken by a jury member(s) that could affect the fairness of the trial.

This objection is used when a witness makes a statement based on what others have said, rather than their own direct knowledge.

This objection is used to prevent a non-expert witness from giving their opinion instead of sticking to the facts.

This objection relates to cross-examination where questions exceed the bounds of what was discussed in direct examination.

This objection is raised when a witness is asked to guess or make assumptions rather than relying on known facts.

This objection states that the evidence, statement, or question does not relate to the particulars of the case or have a valid point to prove.

This objection indicates that the evidence or testimony does not have a substantial or essential relationship to the case.

An objection raised against evidence that suggests a propensity to behave in a certain way, usually not allowed to prove action consistent with character on a particular occasion.

This objection is made when the questioning party tries to prevent further testimony or evidence that goes against their argument.

An objection made when a witness is providing a broad, uninterrupted story or answer rather than responding to specific questions.

This objection indicates that the information or evidence presented is additional to what has already been stated and does not add substantial value.

This objection is made when an attorney harasses or intimidates the witness through aggressive questioning.

This objection asserts that the evidence’s potential to unfairly sway the jury outweighs its probative value.

An objection regarding the lack of necessary preliminary evidence to support the admissibility of the testimony or exhibit.