Discover published sets by community

These rules apply to proceedings in United States courts. The specific courts and proceedings to which the rules apply are detailed within.

Rule 108 doesn’t exist in the Federal Rules of Evidence, thus there is no associated title.

This rule allows the court to restrict evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly to prevent unfair prejudice.

Rule 110 doesn’t exist, hence there is no definition under general provisions for it within the Federal Rules of Evidence.

This rule focuses on preserving a right to appeal by properly objecting to evidence rulings and offers guidance on how courts should handle evidentiary errors.

Rule 104 covers the determination of preliminary questions such as admissibility of evidence, with the judge deciding these matters outside of the jury's presence.

The purpose of these rules is to administer every proceeding fairly, eliminate unjustifiable expense and delay, and promote the development of evidence law, to the end of ascertaining the truth and securing a just determination.

Rule 112 is not part of the Federal Rules of Evidence, therefore it provides no guidance on the development of the rules.

Rule 111 doesn’t exist in the Federal Rules of Evidence, so there are no specified amendments to refer to.

Rule 109 doesn’t exist in the Federal Rules of Evidence, so there is no history associated with it.

When a writing or recorded statement is introduced, an adverse party may require the introduction of any other part or any other writing or recorded statement that should fairly be considered with it.