Discover published sets by community

The nature and circumstances of the crime are considered, focusing on the severity and heinousness.

Statements from the victim's family which may influence the decision by highlighting the impact of the crime.

The defendant's prior criminal convictions and conduct are evaluated to assess future dangerousness.

Defendant's ability to understand the nature of the act and distinguish right from wrong is considered.

Juveniles are typically excluded from capital punishment, while the defendant's age may affect their culpability.

Information which may reduce the perceived responsibility of the defendant or argue against the death penalty.

The level of intent and premeditation involved in committing the crime affects eligibility for the death penalty.

Though officially race should not factor, there is ongoing debate about racial bias in death penalty cases.

The jury's perception of the defendant and the crime can influence the decision in imposing the death penalty.

Testimonies by psychologists, criminologists, or other experts that could affect the sentencing decision.

Although not a legal criterion, there's concern over how socioeconomic status may influence death penalty cases.

The presence of torture or extreme cruelty can be an aggravating factor that influences capital punishment decisions.

Crimes involving multiple victims can increase the likelihood of receiving a death sentence.

If the homicide occurred during the commission of a felony, it may qualify the offender for the death penalty.

A defendant's expressed remorse or lack thereof can be a significant factor during sentencing.

The quality and availability of legal resources for the defendant can affect the outcome in death penalty cases.

Media coverage and public opinion can influence the proceedings and verdict in capital punishment cases.

The location where the crime was committed often dictates the likelihood of receiving the death penalty.

Characteristics of the victim, such as age or social status, may affect the likelihood of imposing the death penalty.

Although not a criterion for imposing, the method of execution available can be a subject of legal scrutiny.

Defendants may be able to avoid the death penalty by accepting a plea deal and pleading guilty to a lesser charge.

International human rights norms and treaties may play a role in death penalty discussions and cases.

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that executing individuals with intellectual disabilities is unconstitutional.

Consideration of whether the defendant is capable of rehabilitation may influence the capital punishment decision.