Discover published sets by community

The case dealt with the collection of sales taxes from online purchases. The New York Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the state, leading to what is widely known as the 'Amazon tax'. This decision influenced many states to adopt similar laws requiring online retailers to collect sales taxes, impacting the e-commerce industry by increasing the cost of online transactions.

This Supreme Court case addressed the issue of patent infringement and the conditions under which a court should grant a permanent injunction. The Supreme Court held that an injunction should not automatically be issued based on a finding of patent infringement and remanded the case for further proceedings. This decision has made it harder for patent holders to get injunctions against e-commerce companies, which has implications for technology companies' strategies around patents.

The case focused on whether iPhone users can sue Apple for antitrust violations for the way it manages the App Store. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that iPhone users could proceed with their antitrust lawsuit. This ruling has implications for e-commerce platforms that could now face increased legal challenges over their market operations from end-users.

A landmark Supreme Court decision overruled the Quill Corp. v. North Dakota decision, stating that states can mandate that businesses without a physical presence in the state still collect and remit sales tax on online sales. This decision has massively influenced the e-commerce industry by expanding the tax obligations of online retailers, regardless of their physical location.

The case centered on whether Google's use of Java API packages in its Android operating system constituted 'fair use' under copyright law. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Google, concluding that the copying was indeed 'fair use'. The outcome influences the software and e-commerce industry by setting a precedent for how APIs can be used, potentially encouraging innovation and compatibility.

The case dealt with the enforcement of arbitration agreements in contracts, specifically whether companies could include clauses that prohibit class-action lawsuits. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of American Express, upholding the arbitration agreement. The outcome influences the e-commerce industry by allowing companies to limit class-action suits, thus affecting how consumer disputes are resolved.

This case revolved around whether the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has the authority to challenge inadequate data security practices as 'unfair' trade practices. The court held that the FTC could bring suit against companies for poor cybersecurity measures that put consumer data at risk. The outcome influences the e-commerce industry by highlighting the importance of cybersecurity and the potential legal consequences for breaches.