Discover published sets by community

Also known as the argument from design, the teleological argument holds that the complexity and purposefulness of the universe suggest the existence of a designer, which is often understood to be God. This argument has been influential but also widely critiqued, especially after Darwin's theory of evolution.

This argument holds that since humans have fundamental desires (e.g., for justice, meaning), which cannot be satisfied in this life, there must exist another reality where these desires can be fulfilled, implicating the existence of God. It suggests humans are 'wired' for such transcendence.

Proposed by Anselm of Canterbury, the ontological argument posits that God, being the greatest possible being ('than which nothing greater can be conceived'), must exist in reality because existence in reality is greater than existence in the mind alone. Its significance lies in its purely a priori approach, independent of empirical evidence.

This argument suggests that the presence of consciousness and the mind's capacities are better explained by the existence of a supreme consciousness, God. It addresses the 'hard problem of consciousness' and posits God as the ultimate source of consciousness.

This argument asserts that personal experiences of the divine provide direct evidence of God's existence. Its significance lies in its emphasis on subjective, personal encounters, though it faces challenges regarding the verifiability and universality of such experiences.

The argument from contingency states that because contingent things exist, there must be a necessary being (God) that explains why anything exists at all. It challenges the assumption that the universe could exist uncaused and posits God as a necessary existent.

The moral argument proposes that the existence of objective moral values and duties suggests the existence of a moral lawgiver, typically identified as God. It emphasizes the difficulty of grounding objective morality in a godless universe, thus inferring God's existence as necessary for moral absolutes.

Blaise Pascal argued that it is rational to live as if God exists because the potential benefits outweigh the potential costs. It is significant not as a proof but as a pragmatic justification for belief in God, highlighting the decision-theoretic aspect of faith.

The cosmological argument asserts that everything that exists has a cause, leading to the conclusion that the universe must have a first cause, often identified as God. This argument is significant for its basis in the empirical observation of causality and attempts to address the problem of infinite regress.