Explore tens of thousands of sets crafted by our community.
Skepticism and Responses
15
Flashcards
0/15
Cognitive biases impair our ability to gain true knowledge.
Acknowledging cognitive biases is the first step to mitigating their effects, thus enhancing our ability to pursue knowledge effectively.
The existence of dreams where we cannot distinguish fantasy from reality shows that we cannot trust our experiences.
The fact that we can recognize dreams as distinct from reality upon awakening suggests there are markers that differentiate experiences, allowing us to trust in our awake state perceptions.
Solipsism contends that only one's own mind is certain to exist.
Interactions with external world provide consistent experiences, and practical life requires us to assume other minds exist, which can be justified pragmatically.
Knowledge based on memory is unreliable because memories are often distorted.
While some memories can be distorted, many others are reliably accurate. Corroboration and external evidence can validate memories, thus rendering them useful for knowledge.
The regress problem in epistemology suggests we can never reach firm foundations for knowledge, as any proposition's justification requires further justification ad infinitum.
Foundationalism argues that there are basic beliefs that require no further justification, while coherentism suggests our beliefs need only form a coherent system.
The existence of widespread disagreement undermines the possibility of knowledge.
Disagreement does not preclude the existence of knowledge; it merely shows the complexity of issues and the need for critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning.
The problem of induction suggests we cannot know the future based on the past.
While we cannot be certain, induction is a practical tool for making probabilistic inferences about the future, supported by the regularity of natural laws.
Brain-in-a-vat scenarios cast doubt on all our knowledge claims.
While we cannot disprove the brain-in-a-vat scenario, acting under this skeptical hypothesis is impractical. Our experiences are consistent and coherent enough to form a working model of reality.
In a philosophical context, radical skepticism posits that we can know nothing at all.
If we can know 'nothing at all,' that itself is a form of knowledge, which contradicts radical skepticism. Constructive skepticism invites us to question and refine our methods of knowledge acquisition.
We cannot have knowledge because our senses are often deceptive.
While our senses can be deceptive, we can use reason and scientific methods to verify sensory data, thus acquiring reliable knowledge.
Absolute certainty is required for knowledge; without it, we have none.
Knowledge does not require absolute certainty. Justified true belief is a widely accepted standard for knowledge without the need for infallibility.
Language is a barrier to knowledge as it imposes a conceptual framework that distorts reality.
Though language shapes our understanding, it also allows for complex communication and collaborative verification, which are essential for knowledge development.
The existence of illusions proves that our perception cannot be trusted.
Understanding illusions helps us differentiate between false and accurate perceptions, thereby improving our cognitive abilities and trust in perception.
All beliefs are culturally relative, meaning we cannot claim objective knowledge.
Some knowledge can be objective, transcending cultural biases, especially in empirical sciences where observations are repeatable regardless of culture.
Concepts of knowledge are just power plays; 'truth' is about who controls the narrative.
While power dynamics can influence narratives, this does not negate the existence of objective truths which can be uncovered through rigorous, unbiased investigation.
© Hypatia.Tech. 2024 All rights reserved.
